CAT unlimited: the Deutsche Bahn decision
Where the Commission has issued a decision finding several addressees liable for the same infringement, amongst the more important tactical questions for a claimant in the UK are: where to sue the...
View ArticleCompetition round-up: Summer 2012
As most of us are now returned from our summer holidays, I thought I’d take advantage of the ‘back to school’ feeling with a round-up of the most significant competition cases since Easter. This also...
View ArticleAnyone for another round? The Court of Appeal’s nuanced approach to the duty...
The duty of “sincere cooperation” set out in Article 4(3) TEU requires Member States to take appropriate measures to “ensure fulfillment of the obligations arising out of the Treaties or resulting from...
View ArticleUK government proposes “streamlining” regulatory and competition appeals
The UK government on Wednesday published a consultation on streamlining regulatory and competition appeals. The press spin was that the proposals are all about preventing “armies of lawyers” from...
View ArticleThe Competition Commission’s power to block transactions outside the UK
The judgment in Akzo Nobel NV v Competition Commission [2013] CAT 13 is an important decision on the ability of the Competition Commission (“CC”) to block transactions between companies outside of the...
View ArticleCompetition round-up: Summer 2013
It is time for what has become the Competition Bulletin’s regular half-yearly update of EU and UK competition law developments. (For our previous round-ups see here). Thinking big 2013’s biggest theme...
View ArticleBlackstone Chambers named EU and Competition Law Chambers of the Year
We do not normally use this blog for promotional purposes, but we thought we would make an exception to say that Legal 500 announced this morning that Blackstone Chambers is the winner of its inaugural...
View ArticleTalkTalk v Ofcom – the Court of Appeal stresses that market definition is a...
The Court of Appeal, in TalkTalk v Ofcom [2013] EWCA Civ 1318, recently gave an important reminder to all competition practitioners that market definitions are a tool rather than an end: what matters...
View ArticleCompetition round-up: January 2014
It is again time for a round-up of recent competition law developments which have caught our attention. Most attention-grabbing of all was the European Commission’s genius/bizarre/inexplicable decision...
View ArticlePay TV: Court of Appeal sends message to the CAT
In its recent decision in British Sky Broadcasting Ltd v Office of Communications [2014] EWCA Civ 133 the Court of Appeal has sent a strong message to the CAT, criticising the Tribunal for its failure...
View ArticleCompetition law and public services: insights from the OFT report into higher...
Recent public sector reforms have relied on choice and competition to increase the quality and quantity of service provision, whilst also controlling cost, through a programme known as Open Public...
View ArticleEurotunnel: when buying assets is a merger
When is an asset acquisition a merger? As the Eurotunnel litigation shows, the answer is not clear-cut. The background is the 2011 liquidation of the cross-channel ferry company SeaFrance. It could not...
View ArticleAsset acquisitions revisited
Earlier this year, I suggested that the law on when an asset acquisition might amount to a merger was somewhat opaque. The Court of Appeal’s decision in Eurotunnel II [2015] EWCA Civ 487 has brought...
View ArticleWhen should a decision be remitted to a different decision-maker?
The Court of Appeal’s answer to this question in HCA International Limited v CMA [2015] EWCA Civ 492 was, in effect: rarely. The judgment, which contains some serious criticism of the CMA even though...
View ArticleAsset acquisitions and mergers: Eurotunnel in the Supreme Court
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Eurotunnel II ([2015] UKHL 75) brings some much-needed clarity to what was becoming a rather opaque corner of the UK merger regime. It also contains statements of...
View ArticleThe passing-on “defence” after Sainsbury’s
The passing-on defence – ie. whether the damages suffered by a purchaser of a product which has been the subject of a cartel are reduced if he passes on the overcharge to his own customers – had, as...
View ArticleLicense fees, invalid patents and Article 101 TFEU: Genentech v Hoechst and...
Consider an agreement under which a license fee is payable for use of a patented technology even if it transpires that the patent is invalid. Is such an agreement contrary to Article 101 TFEU? The...
View ArticleBrexit and implications for UK Merger Control – Part 1/3: Should UK merger...
The Competition Bulletin is pleased to welcome the first in a three-part series of blogs on Brexit and merger control by Ben Forbes and Mat Hughes of AlixPartners. Ben and Mat are (with others)...
View ArticleBrexit and implications for UK Merger Control – Part 2/3: Implications for...
The Competition Bulletin is pleased to welcome the second in a three-part series of blogs on Brexit and merger control by Ben Forbes and Mat Hughes of AlixPartners. Ben and Mat are (with others)...
View ArticleBrexit and implications for UK Merger Control – Part 3/3: Managing and...
The Competition Bulletin is pleased to welcome the third in a three-part series of blogs on Brexit and merger control by Ben Forbes and Mat Hughes of AlixPartners. Ben and Mat are (with others)...
View Article
More Pages to Explore .....